Some people think that the Tour de France is at the bleeding edge of tech as far as the bicycle goes, but I suspect that apart from wider tires and rims, TDF tech probably plateaued at least 5 years ago. To me, most "advances" seem to be adding complexity and trying to fix problems that weren't there in the first place. Electronic shifting and a multitude of
bottom bracket standards don't really trickle down in a useful way to the man on the street. Aero frames won't add that much value to your commuting day. Maybe disc brakes will be adopted soon in the peloton, although I cant see the average roadie actually wanting to bleed the brakes on his road bike. I know I hate doing it on my MTB's, and they are not even the "problem-brakes". The difference in performance doesn't actually look that big in this test with
GCN, until it gets wet. (Video).
|
Kogel Bottom Bracket chart. |
It seems to me that there is useful technology, and there is tech-for-tech's-sake, which is mostly just there to sell new widgets. I am as much a geek as the next person, maybe more so, but sometimes I ask myself if this stuff is good for the cause of the bicycle, which is in essence an inherently simple and elegant device.
|
The owner of this narrow wide
1x sprocket was cutting them out
in 2 to 3 weeks. He changed
brands which helped a lot. |
You might say that taking an MTB drive-chain down from 27 or 20 speeds to 11 speeds by eliminating a front chain-ring is simplifying the drive train, but it would be a shame if the trade-off was advanced wear in shifters, chains, front sprockets and added weight and complexity in the derailer, and the fact that you could either ride to the trail at a decent pace
OR actually ride up the hills, but not both. Not a problem if you don't ride in hills, or on the flat I guess. Where I live we actually ride to the trails. 1x11 is a
Race
Day
Only compromise in my view. Why did we need 1x11? To save weight for XC racers? Why did we need narrow-wide chain-rings and clutch derailers? To stop the chain dropping off because we removed the front derailer. Fixing a "problem" that created several more actual problems.
I guess this is what you get with design. The more you hone a design to excel in one area, the more unsuitable it becomes for general usage. A Formula 1 car will cost a bomb, and will go like stink, but you wont want to drive it to work. This is where your Carbon road bike is right now, light, fast, and mostly uncomfortable. I used to own a
Moto Guzzi Lemans, and while I loved that throbbing V-twin on the open road, it was a pig around town, where I preferred to ride my
Honda CT90 postie bike.
Ideally the marketers want us to have many many bikes (N+1 is the number) rather than one bike that will do most things. New niches are constantly being created for the latest thing, Enduro, Gravel grinding or Bikepacking or what ever people have actually been doing for years anyway, but without a label. People used to ride their old steel road bikes off road, now its a "thing".
It would be interesting to see what people think the biggest recent "real" tech advance in cycling is. I suspect that its not electronic gears, maybe wider rims? The 650B wheel format that has been the norm for
randoneers for years has been rebranded as 27.5 to create more confusion for the
poor people who have only just changed from 26 inch to 29 inch wheels, (29ers just being 700c rebranded anyway.) If you think about it logically why would anyone make the move from 26 inch to 27.5 inches. The difference is too small. From a marketing point of view you would be better to go from 26 inch to 29 inch,
then back down to 27.5 inch, which is the way it has panned out.
Listen to a very interesting podcast here on frame building and 650B vs 700 and how in this chap's view a 650B might serve most people better than their 700c roadie. It gives a bit of background on how 700c bikes got to where they are today.
This is a great piece with a similar angle on
Why Are Bicycle Sales Declining where the writer asks the question:
"Imagine if car dealers only sold recreational cars. Cars for racing and off-roading. Cars not really suited to daily use". It's probably the most relevant read I've seen for years and answers the question of why my road bike sits unused in my garage even though it's probably the fastest, lightest and most efficient bike I have.
I think its really sad to see the adopting of bad designs or the creation of unnecessary designs.
Company A comes out with a new bottom bracket standard called SPF3000.
Company B says its rubbish and A will regret it. Buyers flocks to
Company A like moth to a flame, and before long
Company B is losing so much market share that they have to adopt the same standard or come out with their own new bottom bracket, PFTT 50210. This is probably what happened with Shimano going to 1x11 speed. Purely conjecture on my part though.
Now we are in the amazing situation of having our shifting available in electronic, wifi and hydraulic forms. Was there really anything wrong with cable shifting? There is a lot more fun coming up with the new axle standards too. I am not following it too closely, given that most of my 7 bikes run 9 speed I cant really be called an early adopter.
In Bikepacking circles (also known as Bike Trekking or Cycle Touring) there is a thing called MYOG, make your own gear, where people are building their own luggage systems. This is an example of something that is
needs based, not "
marketing-based". Some folks get so good at it that they go into business, like
Revelate or
Porcelain Rocket. Now some of the big guys are jumping on the bandwagon for a piece of the action, big hitters like Thule or Blackburn. Whether they can react to demand like the way the small guys can is yet to be seen. 2014
Tour Divide winner
Jefe Branham still builds his own gear, such is the culture of DIY or "self-supportedness" in that scene.
|
Lael Wilcox. Image from Revelate's Instagram |
To check out some "useful" tech in action look at some of the
Tour Divide bikes.
Lael Wilcoxes bike has a carbon fibre frame with a state of the art luggage system with an internal skeleton. A dynamo hub that powers lights or charges GPSs, phones and spare batteries. On this bike she was able to cover over
260kms of wilderness riding each day to finish the
4418km Tour Divide in 17 days. Tour de France riders average a paltry
160kms a day and take 21 days to cover 3360 .
Did technology enable her to ride faster for longer? Possibly, but there are pros and cons. Her press-fit bottom bracket failed her and was replaced mid-route, as did Jay Petervary's.
(Jay's Bike).
Jay is a legend in Bike Packing circles having won most of the major endurance events of that genre and he was riding the latest hi-tech offering from Salsa, the new carbon fibre
Cutthroat, a purpose built Tour Divide bike. I'm not sure how long it took to replace Jay's BB on route when it failed, but the guy who won,
Josh Kato only did so by around 20 minutes. 20 minutes after 14 days in a non-drafting race is as good as a sprint. What was Josh's tech level like?
Not very high. Josh rode a
3x9 speed titanium Salsa Fargo with bar end shifters like you get on time trial bikes, with a "friction" option. Almost anti-tech. No fast wearing narrow-wide chain rings or overly complex clutched rear derailer for him. Instead, the much maligned XTR rapid-rise (my favourite). If your cable breaks it defaults to the biggest rear sprocket, and at 34, instead of a 42, its going to offer a lot more options if your front shifting is still working. Following his incredible (failed) attempt at the Tour Divide the year before (
an amazing read) he was leaving nothing to chance and was probably hauling a lot more gear than most. He didn't use a dynamo hub for lighting or charging, but he did have a spare GPS after seeing his partner's one fail the year before.
Tour Divide drive-train placings
1st, 3x9, Josh Kato,
2nd, 2x10, Jay Petervary,
3rd, 1x11,
Neil Beltchenko
Australian Jesse Carlson has just finished the
TransAmerica, a self-supported
6,800km race across the US. He finished in 18 days, 480kms ahead of his next competitor. Thats
377kms a day, double what the Tour de France riders do, but unlike the Tour Divide, it's all on road. Check out his bike, a plush titanium Curve with hydraulic disc brakes, electronic shifters and dynamo hub powered lights. Don't look at his seat. Not much padding on a 98 gram seat.
Some of his gear is from the high-end German manufacturer
Tune and some of it is from his own company
Curve Cycling. Jesse's
SP dynamo hub was not only charging his
kLite lights, but also his, Shimano Di2's external battery and his Iphone and Garmin Etrex 30 GPS. Why an Etrex 30 and not an Edge series GPS? Safety.The Etrex series has a longer burn time than the more modern touch screened versions and it can take batteries from a gas station or convenience store on route as an emergency back-up should his charging regime fail. Did Jesses charging regime fail? It did actually. This year the temperatures in the race were so high at times that his USB converter, which alters the current from the dynamo to enable charging of his devices, got cooked in the heat. His GPS also suffered temporary thermal shut-down and his Iphone charging cable fried. With weather hot enough to cook cables he changed tack, deciding to do more riding in the cooler evenings, as the dynamo hub and lights were unaffected. He went to plan B for charging devices which meant a USB charger in power sockets. Always have a plan B where tech is involved.
Specs on Jesses bike and kit.
Another one of these endurance events, which is closer to
Henri Desgrange's original ideal of what the TDF was meant to be is the
Transcontinental . It's another self-supported race that this year went from Belgium to Istanbul. Around
4239kms for the winner; you get to choose your own route. The winner
Josh Ibbet cranked it out in under 10 days.
423kms a day. Here is something to think about when choosing a sleeping mat, a quote from Josh. "Last year, I thought I was travelling really light with a lightweight
air mat. After the first or second night I really couldn’t be bothered
to blow it up". Now he uses nothing. That's low-tech. The fact that there is next to no time traveling in the wilderness means they don't need too much gear, but it's interesting the lengths he goes to for comfort while riding. 28mm tubeless tires, aero bars and hydraulic disc brakes like Jesse's TransAm bike. This is the kind of bike you could commute on, although he mentions that previous riders who used Di2 say the batteries flatten after around 11 days of constant use. Check out his kit list
here for more details.
I will finish off this rambling diatribe with two (mostly) different approaches to tech. The 1st and 2nd place getters in last years 360 mile Oregon Outback gravel race. Jan Heine's almost retro looking
rando bike and Ira Ryans
Breadwinner cycles custom rig.
I think it would be safe to say that the only thing they have in common is frame material and down-tube shifters. Yes down-tube shifters, like in the olden days, well, sort of like in the olden days. Ira's used a mechanism tweaked to accept 11 speed TT shifter internals, while Jan's is a two levered system. Nothing much to go wrong there. But they are both very usable bikes that are unlikely to let you down, which is what you want when you are out in the boonies.
RIDER |
Jan Heine |
Ira Ryan |
Frame |
Rene Herse steel custom rando bike |
Breadwinner B-Road, steel |
Fork |
Steel, made by Kaiesi |
Enve carbon CX disc fork |
Wheels |
650B |
700 c |
Tires |
42mm Compass babyshoe Pass Extralight |
38mm Panaracer Pasela Tourguard |
Front rings |
46/30 Renee Herse crank. |
50/34 Shimano Durace |
Rear Cluster |
5 speed 14-22 |
11 speed shimano 11-25 |
Derailers |
1930s Nivex rear, custom built suicide shifter front |
Durace rear and front |
Brakes |
Mafac Raid centerpull (1970s) |
TRP Hylex hydraulic disc |
Saddle |
Brooks Professional |
Sella Italia Flight (90's) |
Shifters |
Down-tube 2x5 |
Down-tube 2 x11 |
Bottom bracket |
Press-fit (Edit) see Jan's comment in the "comments" |
Threaded english 68mm. |
Extras |
Dynamo hub/lights and mudguards |
|
*Most of this info was gleaned from CX Magazine. Ira's Bike and Jan's Bike.
Check out Jan's cluster. 5 gears, with a beautiful Rene Herse crank. Imagine how strong and light a 650B wheel with 5 sprockets could be. Read the links to CX Magazine or go to
Jan's blog for a fresh angle on the bicycle.
It does make you think about how important the "technology" is on your bike. Is it an advance or a liability?
|
Jan Heine's Rene Herse custom. 2nd in the Oregon Outback. Image from Bicycle Quarterly |
Links from this post.
Jay Petervary -
http://www.tetongravity.com/lone-mind-jay-petervary
Jays bike http://www.outsideonline.com/1990666/will-bike-win-tour-divideJan Heine's bike in CX-Mag.
https://www.cxmagazine.com/gravel-grinder-bike-jan-heine-oregon-outback-360-2014Ira Ryans bike in CX-Mag.
http://www.cxmagazine.com/winning-gravel-grinder-oregon-outback-winner-ira-ryans-breadwinner
Breadwinner cycles http://breadwinnercycles.com/Josh Ibbet pre-TCR
http://road.cc/content/news/158332-qa-transcontinental-rider-josh-ibbett
Josh Ibbets bike and kit.
http://road.cc/content/news/158492-transcontinental-bike-race-josh-ibbett-s-bike-and-equipment
Revelate Designs
http://www.revelatedesigns.com/
Josh Kato interview
https://www.revelatedesigns.com/blog/index.cfm/2015/07/17/Tour-Divide-Winner--Josh-Kato-Interview
Josh Kato's kit list.
http://www.bikepacking.com/gear/josh-kato-tour-divide-pack-list/
Josh's Bike
http://www.bikepacking.com/gear/salsa-fargo-ti-josh-kato-tour-divide/
Josh Katos
2015 TourDivide scratch. Amazing read.
Curve Cycling
http://www.curvecycling.com.au/
SP Dynamo hubs (plays annoying music)
http://www.sp-dynamo.com/
kLite Lights
http://www.klite.com.au/
Road Bike Review - Do-disc-brakes-stop-you-faster-than-rim-brakes
http://transambikerace.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: These are my own personal views, and opinions, and are no more or less valid than anyone else who has a blog's view. They come from my experiences as a rider and consumer of cycling products across several genres: XC, CX,Track, TT, Road and Bikepacking. I have never worked in the industry. I do 95% of the work on my own bikes and would like to keep it that way. I currently foolishly have 8 bikes but if the zombie apocalypse comes the one bike I would like to have at my disposal would be my early model Karate Monkey. I am not afraid of technology, I have been using a PowerTap power meter for years and have recently brought a dynamo hub and all the accoutrement's.